Midweek Musings 7 21.01.2026 Landscape management.
By Malini Shankar
At the core of land use policy (for Smart city governance) or any other public policy related to landscape management is the priorities apportioned to prioritized land use. That asks for verticals of the urban economy to integrate with biodiverse ecosystems for a holistic natural resource management based Climate friendly sustainable economy. For example Climate adapted urban architecture utilizes the natural ecosystem by sequestering Carbon, and auxilerating the green belt sustainably. That means public policy has to clearly define land use priorities:
1.
Central
Business District.
2.
Commercial
and trade establishments.
3.
Agricultural
land / food supply land / water and resources; grazing pens, veterinary
hospitals, for livestock, grazing lands, all this must be planned for
agricultural band.
4.
Agricultural
produce markets.
5.
Supply
Chain and Logistics (planning)
6.
Common
Property Resources (like health care infrastructure, educational infrastructure
/ institutions / research institutions, research labs etc.)
7.
Multiple
modes of Public Transport with dedicated transport lanes.
8.
Protected
Water Bodies,
9.
Parks,
Green Belt and Green Cover,
10.
Highways,
Arterial roads, Main Roads, Cross roads, lanes, etc.
11.
Other
landscapes like rocks, valleys, and wilderness areas have to be protected and
conserved per policy - as it is - on a per capita basis.
12.
Wilderness
areas even inside urban areas help in protection of urban wildlife (like
reptiles, birds, tree dwellers like nocturnal mammals, rodents etc.) They are
invalidated because of habitat loss and threat of extinction because of habitat
loss.
13.
Agriculture
and food supply is the one sector
that needs landscape planning and management the most. Given that agriculture
and food supply needs fertile land and fresh water supply systems, land use
planning for cultivation, water bodies, livestock penning, supply and logistics
grazing lands, needs critical attention. The urban population’s demands must be
directly proportional to the supply and demand. Imagine if there is enough
agricultural land to serve the food supply needs of people and animals from
within the district. Grow local, and buy local is quite literally the scene.
Ofcourse one cannot expect to grow millet in areas where rice or water hungry
crops can be grown. So that needs planning too. But a band of fertile land with
rich underground water sources (which is incidentally already there in all of
India) has only to be earmarked and banded in such a way that the population settlements
should be calibrated according to HDI in that district. Irrigation systems too
have to be small and sustainable, obviously.
14.
Sanitation
infrastructure and logistics, catchment area and drainage areas have to be
planned and protected.
15.
Orphanages,
sanatoria, cemeteries / crematoria – to be planned on a per capita basis, must
be located at the far end of the district bands. Cemeteries need thick tree
cover. Tree lined cemeteries can be part of Green Belt.
16.
Disaster
relief, policing and fire services to be calibrated per HDI on a per capita
basis.
You see the dire need for census
results?
Comments
Post a Comment